How to Choose Between LTL and FTL Shipping:

A Complete Decision Framework

LTL vs FTL shipping decisions directly impact your bottom line. The wrong choice costs money through inefficient routing, damaged goods, or missed delivery windows. This decision system cuts through the complexity to help you choose the right method every time, whether you’re shipping one pallet or twenty.

Understanding LTL and FTL Shipping Fundamentals

Less-than-truckload shipping consolidates multiple customers’ shipments into one truck. Your freight travels with others, making stops at terminals for sorting and redistribution. This hub-and-spoke system works best for shipments between 150 and 10,000 pounds.

Truckload shipping dedicates the entire truck to your shipment alone. No stops, no sharing space, no extra handling. Your freight goes directly from pickup to delivery, making FTL ideal for shipments over 10,000 pounds or sensitive cargo requiring special care.

According to Global Market Insights, the global less-than-truckload market was valued at USD 227 billion in 2024 and will grow at 5.3% CAGR through 2034, driven by e-commerce growth and SME shipping demands. This growth reflects the increasing need for cost-effective freight shipping solutions that don’t require full truck capacity.

Shipment Size and Weight Analysis

Shipment size determines your shipping method more than any other factor. The six-pallet rule provides a starting point: under six pallets typically favors LTL, over six pallets often justifies FTL pricing.

Weight density matters as much as pallet count. Dense shipments reach FTL weight limits with fewer pallets, while bulky, lightweight cargo may need FTL space despite lower weight. Calculate both dimensions and weight to make accurate comparisons.

Freight class drives LTL pricing through classifications from 50 to 500. Class 50 represents dense, easily handled freight like steel, while class 500 covers light, bulky items requiring special handling. Understanding your freight class prevents pricing surprises and identifies cost optimization opportunities.

Partial truckload bridges the gap between LTL and FTL. When your shipment exceeds typical LTL parameters but doesn’t fill a truck, partial truckload offers dedicated space at rates between LTL and FTL. This option works well for LTL shipping solutions that need faster transit than standard LTL networks provide.

Cost Structure Breakdown

Base rates tell only part of the cost story. Accessorial charges for residential delivery, liftgate service, inside delivery, and appointment scheduling can double your shipping bill. FTL accessorials include detention time, extra stops, and specialized equipment fees.

Freight consolidation strategies reduce costs by combining shipments or coordinating multiple LTL loads. Advanced transportation management systems identify these opportunities automatically, calculating true total costs including fuel surcharges, insurance, and potential damage claims.

Transit Time Variables

Delivery times vary dramatically between methods. FTL provides direct routing with predictable schedules, typically delivering 1-3 days faster than LTL for similar distances.

LTL networks require time for consolidation at origin terminals, linehaul transportation, deconsolidation at destination terminals, and final delivery. This process adds 2-5 days compared to direct FTL routing. Now, guaranteed delivery options exist for both methods at premium pricing. FTL carriers offer precise delivery windows through dedicated service, while LTL networks provide guaranteed services with specific commitments.

Peak season capacity constraints affect both methods differently. FTL rates fluctuate with market demand, while LTL networks may experience service delays during high-volume periods like holiday shipping seasons. Shipping timeline requirements often override cost considerations for time-sensitive cargo. Emergency shipments, production line supplies, and perishable goods frequently justify FTL despite higher costs.

Cargo Protection Strategies

Cargo handling frequency directly correlates with damage risk. LTL shipments experience multiple touchpoints during consolidation and deconsolidation, while FTL maintains cargo integrity through minimal handling.

Packaging requirements differ significantly between methods. LTL shipments need robust packaging to survive multiple handling events and potential stacking with other freight. FTL allows optimized packaging that balances protection with cost efficiency.

High-value, fragile, or hazardous shipments often require FTL regardless of size. The reduced handling, dedicated space, and direct routing provide better cargo protection than LTL networks can offer. Many businesses face LTL trucking challenges that make FTL the safer choice for sensitive freight.

Decision Matrix Application

Start with shipment size and weight against the six-pallet threshold. Factor in delivery times requirements, cargo protection needs, and total cost including accessorials. Exception scenarios like high-value small shipments or time-critical deliveries may override standard guidelines.

Freight capacity availability during peak seasons influences decisions beyond normal parameters. Experienced logistics providers navigate these complexities using market knowledge, carrier relationships, and analytical tools that optimize both cost and service levels. Whether you need comprehensive FTL shipping guidance or LTL optimization, the right approach combines multiple decision factors.

Optimize Your Freight Strategy With PRIMO

Successful LTL vs FTL shipping decisions require analyzing multiple variables simultaneously. Cost, service, and operational needs must align with your business objectives and customer expectations. Freight shipping success comes from choosing the right method for each shipment. Request a quote from PRIMO to get started.